(Its More Than Merely Disgusting)

Thank God I'm Gay

Throughout recorded history, all civilizations and major religions have discriminated against homosexuality.  Was such discrimination based upon reason or prejudice?

Gays claim that:

  1. they are discriminated against solely because they are different,
  2. these differences result in no rational set of harms, and therefore
  3. society is acting prejudicially against them.

Discrimination against murderers and drug users is considered non-prejudicial because society is adversely affected by their acts.  How about homosexual behaviour - does it harm the actors and/or endanger the community?

Outside of "What Homosexuals Do" brochure

Gay Sex Is Anti-Biologic Sex

The recent literature regarding homosexual activities are not only unsanitary and disgusting but monumental assaults on the human body.  Homosexuals admit to fellating almost every one of their sexual contacts (and ingesting semen from about half of these [16]).  Seminal fluid contains virtually every germ carried in the blood, thus gays are essentially consuming raw human blood with all its attendant medical risks.  Any, perhaps most [16], homosexual contacts involve kissing and consequent salivary exchange.  A very large fraction of both sexual and non-sexual diseases can be transmitted via saliva.  Since most homosexual exchange occurs between strangers, 70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners [17]), and gays average somewhere between 20 (Table 1) and 106 [16] different partners/year, the potential for infection and transmission is considerable.

The next-most common gay sex act is rectal intercourse.  It too is fraught with biologic danger.  First, the anus must be lubricated enough to allow penetration of the penis.  Often fingers and/or tongue are used to stretch and moisten the opening.  Saliva or an artificial lubricant is employed to make the event possible.  Saliva contains many germs and substances foreign to the rectum.  Artificial lubricants are easily contaminated and their long-term health effects on the rectum and in interaction with the blood are unknown.

Tearing or bruising of the anal wall (which is only one cell thick) during anal/penile sex is almost inevitable.  If 'toys' are employed (homosexual argot for various objects which are inserted into the rectum – sometimes bottles, carrots, light bulbs or especially designed devices) the risk for contamination is also considerable.

Thus, via the anus 1) foreign saliva and its germs and/or some artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient’s own faeces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it (often, it will have recently been in another mouth or anus) , and 4) the sperm and-seminal fluid of the inserter gain direct access to the blood stream.  Not before 1984 [ 15] was it discovered that sperm readily penetrate the anal wall and cause massive immunological damage to the body's T- and B- cell defensive systems (sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina) and soon render the participant immunologically compromised - set up for a host of insidious infections.  Further, the penis of the inserter bears some risk of infection.  About half of all male syphilis is carried by gays as a rectal infection and the faecal material into which he is plunging can enter his body through his urethra.  Since gays masturbate about twice as much as heterosexuals [2] and many take drugs to prolong their erections, the penis is often bruised or cut before or during these activities, so infection via the mucous membrane and/or bruises or cuts is a considerable risk.  Over 90% of gays regularly participate in this bit of biological insanity.

While even a schoolboy knows not to eat human waste, about two-thirds of homosexuals regularly lick and/or insert their tongues into the anus of their 'lovers' and thus ingest biologically significant amounts of faeces, because they usually don't know where the penis they fellate has been recently, many of those fellators who don't participate in anal-Iicking unwittingly end up consuming faeces as well.  While the human body has defences against it, exposure to the faecal discharge of dozens of strangers is patently unhealthful and unwise.

As homosexuality has become more open, proliferation of anti-biologic activity has flourished.  By 1983 well over a third of gays admitted to participation in fisting (inserting the hand and arm, sometimes up to the armpit, into the rectum of sex-partners).  This absurdity was so rare in Kinsey's time he didn't even think to ask about it.  The rectum was not designed to accommodate the hand and arm – over time many of those that engage in this stupidity find their sphincter weakened to such a degree that they 'dribble' at inconvenient times.  The trend in Table 1 is fairly clear.  Urinating on and/or torturing 'lovers' for sexual sport appears to have at least doubled in incidence since the 1940's, and fisting has increased astronomically.  Further, the first random study of gay sexual practices (2) found 17% admitting to eating and/or rubbing themselves with the faeces of partners and an additional 12% reported giving and receiving enemas as part of sexual pleasure.

Although gay estimates of 'numbers of partners per year' might strike the average person as outrageous enough, the only study that had homosexuals keep a sexual diary suggests that the estimates are too low [16].  Whereas gays had estimated about 60 partners/year, the diaries suggested that the real figure was nearer to 100!  Some of this may relate to the use of the word "partner".  To a heterosexual, "partner" usually means anyone with whom one has sexual relations – but many gays don't count bathroom, gloryhole (two adjoining booths with a small opening or "gloryhole" at genital level for the purpose of engaging in anonymous sexual activity) or peepshow 'tricks' since they often can't even see the person with whom they are having sex (sometimes they can't even see the organ).  Possibly the estimates in Table 1 should be doubled to accord with empirical reality.  Whatever the case, the diary study indicated that, on an average, gays:

  • fellated 106 different men, and swallowed so of their seminal discharges,
  • experienced 72 penile penetrations of the anus, and
  • ingested the faecal material of 23 different men ...  PER YEAR.

It is readily apparent why 7% acquired hepatitis A and 10% hepatitis B in the 6 month period of the study.

Gay activist and chairman of the American Psychological Association's ethics committee, Dr. Morin, reported that his study of 824 gays indicated that fear of AIDS had lowered their sex-rate from 70 different partners a year in 1982 to 50 by mid-1984.  [20] McKusick [21] reported declines from 76 to 47 in the same period.


Gay Activities and Diseases (in %)

 1940s ever
 1977 ever
 83/84 ever
1983 last year
1984 last year
1983 last month
 oral/penile * 83 99 100/99  99 86  
anal/penile **  68 91 93/98  95 92  95
oral/anal **  59 83 92/92  63    69
 fist in rectum **   22 41/47  34    
urinating on/in each other  10 23  29/            
 sadomasochism ** 22 37  37/            
Other signs of dyshealth             
sexually transmitted disease    78  78/70       
 illegal drug use   64+   90 69  
 carrier of enteric parasites       25 59 39
travel to U.S. in previous year
(average stay 5 weeks) 
With whom sex relations             
ever minors  37 >23  46/           
number of partners per year    >20 10/24    27  
ever do orgies (Y)  61   76 88/          
Where sex occurred             
 public restrooms 14 41 66/          
 gay baths   9 60 67/          
       * unhealthful with multiple partners
       ** unhealthful per se


Fresh Germs From Around The World

The garden variety sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story - salivary exchange, seminal/blood exchange and mixing, faecal exchange, rectal trauma – with dozens of different men each year.  Worse, many, if not most of these encounters occur while the participants are drunk, high on drugs, and/or in an orgy setting.  Additionally, many of these sexual encounters occur in extremely unsanitary settings (bathrooms, gay baths, dirty peep shows).  As if this were not enough, notice the 1984 Denmark study column 5 in Table 1).  About a quarter of these homosexuals travelled internationally.  They shared their fresh Danish parasites with Australian gays and took home fresh pathogens.  (AIDS, of course went with them).  Foreign homosexuals visit Australia daily and mix their germs with our locals' supply (the AIDS cases in Europe appear to have been carried from the U.S.  to them in just this way).  The rate of world-travelling, for American homosexuals is comparable.  The gay 'sex hunt' is growing and encompassing a greater variety of bodies.

Gays are an octopus of infection stretching across the world.  Fresh undiluted germs are its daily food and excrement.  Most gays are veritable Typhoid Marys, pursuing and being pursued by others as biologically lethal as themselves and having sex in settings unrivalled for stupidity and squalor.

Earning Their Infections

AIDS started receiving massive publicity in 1981.  What, aside from demanding government research and treatment money, has been the reaction of homosexuals?  Bear in mind that AIDS is one of, if not the, worst communicable diseases to get.  It can't be cured and victims die a miserable death soaked in fever and diarrhoea.  A smoker who ends up with lung cancer after 20 or 30 years of plying his habit is unfortunate, but he 'earned his disease'.  Everyone knows that smoking is injurious including the smoker.  Likewise with gay sexual practices – you'd have to have been raised in a jar not to know that promiscuous faecal/rectal/oral sex was bad for you.  Did homosexuals stop their odious sexual practices until they knew how AIDS was being transmitted?

It would have been the rational thing to do, of course, but could people with such a captivating set of bad habits stop?  Anyone who has worked with smokers or alcoholics knows the most likely answer is 'no' – and so it has been with homosexuals.  In 1978 1% of the gay blood tested in San Francisco evidenced infection with the putative AIDS retrovirus HTLV-111.  By 1980, 25% of gay blood showed infection with AIDS, and in 1984, three years after the alert and massive public health warnings - after the expenditure of millions and millions of tax dollars on 'educating the gay community' - after all this 65% of gays tested exhibited infection with the AIDS pathogen! [13] [14] Our best information suggests that by 1985 two-thirds of the homosexuals in San Francisco had ·infected themselves with AIDS.  The proportions are likely to be as high in other gay centres and perhaps a little lower elsewhere.

The McKusick [21] study of 655 gays concluded that "knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behaviour." Indeed.  Only 24% of his sample claimed to have been monogamous in the past year, and of these "gay good guys" 5% drank urine, 7% incorporated a fist up their rectum, 33% ingested faeces 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum in the past month! No wonder Dr.  Hunter Handsfield, Director of the Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Program in Seattle, noted in December, 1985 that in the context of the severity of AIDS, these changes are almost ludicrous."[22] To this stinging criticism, McKusick [23] replied that "the recommendation that gay men limit themselves to committed monogamy was discussed and found to lack creativity and to reflect the simple insensitivity of an outsider approaching the gay world.  Although most of our subjects have expressed a desire for more primary partnering in response to AIDS, there has been no significant increase in these bonds during the (three year) period of our investigation."

What gays do sexually is unsanitary insanity.  The numbers with whom they perform their deeds is incredible.  In the face of perhaps the world's worst disease gays have continued their disgusting practices until perhaps half of them evidence infection with the AIDS virus.

Homosexuals have ridden into the dawn of sexual freedom and returned with a plague that gives every indication of destroying them and, perhaps, the rest of humanity.  Those who treat AIDS patients are at great risk (in just the last two years, at least 24 hospital employees in one hospital group have received needle-stick injuries while working with AIDS patients [10] – how many of these will come down with the disease will only be known some years from now, but from the apparent fact that one sex act [18] and possible one use of an infected needle can transmit AIDS, the odds are against them.

Inside of "What Homosexuals Do" brochure

Sexological "Science" vs. Tradition

Kinsey and the bulk of modern sexologists argued loud and long that traditional treatment of homosexuality was antiquated.  "No harm, no foul" they claimed, "these people and their life-style must be accepted, ancient wisdom was little more than thinly-disguised prejudice".  About a third of gays admit to minor/adult sex (Table 1).  Why would we want our precious children learning the 'positive aspects of the gay lifestyle' or experiencing it, any more than we would want to expose them to 'positive aspects of cocaine use'?

Yet the National Educational Association wants teachers hired irrespective of their sexual habits and the American Psychological Association has made it an ethical requirement for its members to work for 'gay rights.'  So the professional educators want to 'give gays a chance' – on our children!  And the psychologists expect us to feel guilty because we wish to protect our society from those with filthy habits.  The leaders of those professional societies may have degrees, but they seem woefully lacking in common sense.  If accepting homosexuality as a viable life-style is the height of contemporary educational and psychological wisdom, then let these professionals find another society to support them in the manner to which they have become accustomed ... their advice isn't worth the grave it is written on.

What homosexuals do is incredibly stupid, so patently absurd and antibiological, that only a foolish society would take their wimpering about 'equal rights with heterosexuality' seriously.  These men are trapped by their own vice into killing themselves.  Are we supposed to feel so sorry for them that we join them in their march to the cemetery?


[1] Jaffe HW et al National case-control study of Kaposi's sarcoma and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in homosexual men: part 1; epidemiologic results "Annuals Internal Medicine" 1983 99 145-151

[2] ISIS national random sexuality survey (conducted in 5 metropolitan areas, L.A., Denver, Omaha, Louisville, Washington, D.C.) involving 4,340 adults in 1983: 842 in Dallas in 1984.  An extensive (over 550 items) questionnaire was answered by each respondent anonymously.  See Cameron et al, "Nebraska Med Journal" 1985.  70, 292 – 299

[3] Schechter MT et al Changes in sexual behaviour and fear of AIDS "Lancet" June 9, 1984, 1293

[4] Biggar RJ Low T-lymphocyte ratios in homosexual men "J American Med Assn" 1984 251 1441 - 1446

[5] Quinn TC et al The polymicrobial origin of intestinal infection in homosexual men "New England Med" 1983 309 576 - 582 .

[6] Gebhard PH & Johnson AB "The Kinsey data: marginal tabulations of the 1938-63 interviews conducted by the institute for Sex Research NY: Saunders 1979

[7] Jay K & Young A "The gay report" NY: Summit, 1979

[10] Wormser GP et al Needle-stick injuries during care of patients with AIDS "New England J Med" 1984 310 1464

[11] Karlen A "Sexuality and homosexuality" NY: Norton, 1971.

[13] Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Centres for Disease Control, July 13, 1984

[141 Perlman D 2 'AIDS viruses' may be the same "San Francisco Chronicle" July 13, 1984

[15] Manliqit GW et al Chronic immune stimulation by sperm alloantigens "J American Med Assn" 1984 251 (2) 237 - 438

[16] Correy L & Holmes KK Sexual transmission of Hepatitis A in homosexual men "New England J Med" 1980 302 435 -438

[17] Bell Ap & Weinberg MS “Homosexualities: a study of diversity among men and women” NY: Simon & Schuster, 1978

[18] Cabane J et al AIDS in an apparently risk-free woman "Lancet" July 14, 1984 105

[19) Pines by "Back to Basics" NY: Morrow, 1982 p.211

[20] Stewart SA "USA Today" Nov 21, 1984

[21] Mckusick L et al AIDS and sexual behaviour reported by gay men in San Francisco, “Am.  J Pub Health", 1985, 75, 493-96.  Also Agnost v.  Owen Sp.  Ct.  CA (No.  830-321), Oct 10, 1984

[22 ], [23] Letters to Editor, "Am J Pub Health”, Dec 1985, 75, 1449-50

[24] Quoted in "Executive Intelligence Report, Oct 18, 1985

[25] From 1987 conversation with American lecturer Kay Arthur and Australian Director of Youth With A Mission, Tom Hallas

ISIS Position Paper on Homosexuality

Viable societies are organised to sustain themselves by producing and educating succeeding generations.  Each child is expected to repay society for all he has inherited by creating and nurturing a new generation.  In Western society, workers generally receive sufficient income to both sustain themselves and raise a family.  Parents particularly satisfy their debts by teaching their children that soon it will be their turn to repay.

Homosexuals renounce their societal obligation and slavishly devote themselves to self-aggrandisement.  They rob society to pleasure themselves.  Money remaining after their basic requirements are met is regarded as additional opportunity for personal pleasure rather than a loan to be put in to the service of societal betterment.  Getting more by doing less, homosexuals soon come to regard special treatment as their inherent right.  Those who are rewarded for leeching soon come to regard society with contempt, deserving destruction.

Homosexuals often spend their “extra” disposable income roaming the world in search of sexual adventure.  Because of their promiscuity and incredibly unsanitary sexual practises, pathogens once localised to a given geographic region are rapidly being spread throughout the world.  AIDS is a first fruit of this process and many more plagues stemming from homosexual behaviour are bound to occur.  Homosexuals have already compromised the nation's blood supply and are straining the resources of the medical community.  Homosexual activity combined with modern modes of transportation assures that the world's medical problems become both out risk and our financial burden.

Like any interest group, homosexuals construct a philosophy of life from their circumstances, associates and regular activities.  They attempt to validate their lives by getting others to share in their practices and world-view.  Having acquired a monstrous habit, they cannot feel good about themselves until everyone is driven by sexual release.  Tortured by their own lack of productivity they cannot rest until the lives of others are as trivial as their own.  The only way that they can assure that unfavourable comparisons cannot be made is to persuade heterosexuality to become as empty and mean as homosexuality.  That is why homosexuals are such ardent champions of the right to enjoy pornography, adultery, divorce, abortion and sex with children.  In every significant respect, homosexuality is a personal tragedy and a societal calamity.

Drug addicts endanger themselves and others, but knowing they they do wrong the skulk in the dark or pretend that they are not captives to their vice.  They ply their habit to escape the world.  Of all the vices, only homosexuality constitutes a conspiracy against society.  “In the closet” homosexuals thumb their nose at society by having sex in public rest rooms and parks, seducing our children, and exploiting positions of trust for sexual advantage.  “Out of the closet” homosexuals go still further and demand that society confirm to their own sorry image.  Filled with contemptuous amazement that society would grant them standing, they have become even more outrageous with their demands.  Homosexuals demand to have “equal time” to persuade our children in school, to parade on main street, to fill the airways with their defective perspective on life.  Unable, because of their vice, to live genuinely constructive lives, they offer aesthetics instead of moral rectitude, dancing instead of building, “sensitivity” instead of purposeful contribution.

Under no circumstances ought homosexuality to be regarded as other than a destructive habit-system.  Those who recognise homosexuality as a legitimate life-style are being manifestly unkind because they refuse hope and motivation to those homosexually involved and are adding to the sexual difficulties of our civilisation.  Homosexuals should be encouraged to abandon their unfortunate habit as have millions before them.  Those who turn from homosexuality to productive chastity or responsible heterosexuality should be forgiven and welcomed.

Copyright 1986 Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality

About A.F.F.

We have been full time lobbyists for Aussie families since 1983.  AFF is dedicated to upholding Biblical family values, promoting a Biblical Christian worldview, and educating and mobilising concerned individuals to positively affect their homes, communities, country and world.

We not only encourage Christians to be "salt" and "light", but provide credible strategies for doing so.  One of our specific goals is the removal of pornography from the family marketplace where children have access.

Contact A.F.F.

Australian Federation for the Family
c/o Grove Post Office
TAS 7109

Email Us

Come and Join Us

Back to top